![]() |
|
|
|||
|
Articles |
|||
|
Alternative
Sources of Revenue Streams Many Not for Profit organisations place themselves at an unacceptably high level of risk by having only one primary source of income. Whether it be a charity whose income is from government grants, or an organisation whose existence is dependant upon project related external funding, or a membership based organisation whose primary source of income is membership fees, they all place themselves, and their Board members, at risk This
"concentration" risk can be managed by identifying the alternative
sources of income, developing relevant services, and monitoring the
level of risk. To counter this risk, surveys have shown that membership-based Not for Profit organisations place an increasingly heavy reliance on non-dues income (income from other than membership fees) as a source of revenue. The latest survey, based on 716 Not for Profit organisations in U.S showed the following percentages of income derived from membership dues versus other sources: less
than $500,000: 39% dues; (61%) non-dues |
|
||
|
The larger a Not for Profit organisation, the greater reliance there is on non-dues income. Non-dues revenue in itself is neither good nor bad. It is the way in which this source of income fits with the mission of the organisation that is either a good fit, and therefore assists the organisation fulfill its mission, or it is a bad fit and may therefore detract from the organisation fulfilling its mission. Two traps with Non-dues Revenue Often Not for Profit organisations fall into one of two traps in devising and implementing non-dues revenue sources. Firstly, they may not utilise non-dues revenue sources because they do not have the culture of running the organisation like a business, or do not view their organisation as one that has potential for providing services to members over and above what they have traditionally provided. This is true particularly of sporting and welfare organisations. Secondly, Not for Profit organisations often have a habit of growing non-dues revenue sources without consideration of their impact on the mission and objectives of the organisation. This leads to problems of providing services that are not needed by members, but which generate significant income and therefore the organisation becomes reliant, or that "pet projects" that do supply a source of non-dues revenue detract from the organisations ability to resource those services that truly represent the needs of members. This is more true of the membership organisations. Alternative Sources of Revenue and the Strategic Plan Categorising non-dues revenue sources based on their impact on the Strategic Plan is an essential management tool that allows an organisation to monitor the source and use of non-dues revenue. The Strategic Plan is essential as a management tool as it identifies those activities that the organisation MUST get right in the next few years. It is all too easy to get sidetracked with pet projects (either from the Executive Director or from Board members), or projects that generate funds, but do not add to the mission of the organisation. This will, without doubt, divert resources and focus away from what the constituency have identified as those things that the organisation must get right in the next few years to achieve the mission of the organisation. There are three categories of non-dues revenue sources that I have found useful: Category
1: Alternative Sources of revenue from activities totally unrelated to
the Strategic Plan. Category 1: Alternative Sources of revenue from activities totally unrelated to Strategic Plan Recommendations a. These should have a formal Board Policy that recognises the activity is not covered by the Strategic Plan, and is thus outside of the formal planning strategies the organisation has adopted b. The explanation given to the Board and/or to the constituency needs to be more detailed, giving reasons for the activity, and the impact on the organisations resources (cash and personnel). There is an increased potential for constituency dissatisfaction with the employment of the revenue derived from these activities, or from the resources necessary to manage the activity. There is an increased chance that this revenue will be expected to subsidise membership dues or other services. c.
These types of non-dues revenue sources should be regarded as activities
that contribute to the financial profit of the organisation, NOT to the
operating costs. 2.
Fundraising events 3.
Investment income Example of Retained Earnings Policy 1.
Introduction 2.
Benchmarks 3.
Uses of Accumulated Funds Category 2: Alternative Sources of revenue from activities marginally related to Strategic Plan. Recommendations a. Establish a policy (not necessarily at Board level) that covers 1. Justification for introduction 2. Objectives 3. Responsibility structure 4. Operational parameters (eg. Types of activity, range of acceptable activities) 5. Evaluation of Policy b. Typically these activities allow the not-for-profit to achieve its objectives in an indirect way, eg advertising allowing the journal to be of a higher quality, or bigger. These activities should be reported against the key service that the strategic plan has identified as necessary. Eg advertising reported against journal, sponsorship against Congress, products against marketing or P.R. plan. This will focus the Boards attention on the reason why these sources exist, and their contribution, not just financial, to the functions of the organisation. It will also highlight if these sources start to become irrelevant to the mission of the organisation. Examples 1.
Advertising Example of Sponsorship Policy Paper 1. Introduction Sponsorship is the commercial support (financial and/or non-financial) given by an organisation in return for either endorsement of a product/service or access to a select target market from the recipient. The AIBF is an association whose members are significant users of financial services, and as such are prime markets for potential sponsors such as information providers, consultants and banks. The AIBF has received significant sponsorship in the past. Sponsorship worth $80,000 was achieved in 2000, $125,000 in 2001, and $230,000 in 2002. The Institute is increasingly utilising sponsorship, and it is now necessary to formalise a policy on sponsorship. 2.
Objectives
3. Responsibility Structure There are two levels of responsibility:
The major activity centres affected are:
A Central Sponsorship Register should be maintained at National Office, that records the Sponsors contact details, the activity sponsored, the benefits to the sponsor and to the AIBF, and whether accepted or declined, with notation of reasons for decision if appropriate. The written offer or acceptance of sponsorship must come from National Office, albeit confirming the negotiations conducted by the Chapter. This must be a formal Agreement.
There are 6 types of sponsorship arrangements that can be undertaken. 1. A Sole Sponsor with naming rights to the event (Eg Telerate/AIBF FX Competition) 2. Either a Gold, Silver or Bronze Sponsor, depending on the level of dollar sponsorship and resulting grades of sponsorship 3. A Special Event Sponsor responsible for an activity and its resultant costs 4. An In-Kind sponsor who provides material/services rather than dollar amounts 5. An Underwriting Sponsor who guarantees that any losses on an activity will be funded by that sponsor 6. An Endorsement Sponsor that lend their name and perhaps some resources to an activity Range of Acceptable Benefits offered to sponsor 1. Mailing of sponsors literature to members 2. Sponsors Logo/captions on literature 3. Acknowledgement of sponsor in publications/mailouts 4. Editorial in journal 5. Sponsors Advertisements in registrants papers 6. Exhibition space at event 7. Registrants listing 8. Registrations/social events 9. Face-to-face access to members 10. Reserved tables where they have right to nominate seating arrangements 11. Right to hold a hospitality suite. 12. Sponsors representative to address delegates at event. 5.
Acceptable Sponsors 6. Evaluation of Policy The
sponsorship policy should come under formal review on an annual basis
by the National Council This category is the greatest opportunity for the organisation to meet constituency needs in innovative ways. The Strategic Plan identifies strategies and Action Plans that provide the blueprint for the organisations activities. For each Action Plan, there may be up to three commercial activities that can be undertaken by the organisation that not only enhance the results of the action plan, but generate revenue as well. This is an opportunity for the Chief Executive to provide some innovative, value-added service to the not-for-profit organisation. This category is the breeding ground for services that will be found to be indispensable, and which set the tone and culture of the organisation. Example Strategy c: Develop a Technical infrastructure for the AIBF Action
Plan c.3 Project: Finalise policy and procedures for library and research papers within existing financial constraints Resources: National Office, Publications Portfolio (Non-dues revenue opportunity: catalogue and bind articles from journal into a series of readings on specific topics, sell to market; commission books on hot topics for sale; sell the catalogue to the market) 1.
Category 1: Alternative Sources of revenue from activities totally unrelated
to Strategic Plan a.
Formal Board Policy needed 2.
Category 2: Alternative Sources of revenue from activities marginally
related to Strategic Plan. a. Establish operational policy b.Report against the key service that the Strategic plan has identified as necessary. Eg advertising reported against journal, sponsorship against Congress, products against marketing or P.R. plan. 3.
Category 3: Alternative Sources of revenue from activities directly related
to Strategic Plan. b. Measure existing services, including non-dues revenue sources, against the Strategic plan c. Use the Strategic plan to stimulate new ideas for services that can generate resources. Last Word For every activity your organisation undertakes currently, there are at least two commercial spinoffs that you have not yet identified. Further
articles:
|
|||
|
Home | Culture of Consciousness | Our Approach | About Us | News and Events | Resources Copyright
2005 all rights reserved |
|||